This was the headline for a story on one of the news blogs that I read.
Truth was first US casualty in Iraq war: study
Ummm...DUH! I understand that Clinton had a chameleon's approach to the truth but how can one compare a blow job and creative cigar use in the White House to the disaster that is the Bush II presidency?
I have one question: Where is Osama bin Laden? I mean, shoot, Saddam Hussein was found in about two seconds buried in a bloody hole in the ground. It's been over six years since we invaded Afghanistan. Every time there's a White House press briefing, someone ought to ask, "Where is Osama bin Laden?"
"Hey Condi? Any word on Osama?"
"Yo, Mr. Chertoff. How's the hunt for Osama coming along?"
"Mr. President. See Osama Run. Run Osama Run. Find Osama George."
I can tell you where Osama isn't: Iran or North Korea. And I know this even without getting those super duper top secret national security briefings every morning that George Dubya apparently doesn't bother to read (probably because they use big words like, "classified" and "nuclear" GAH!). Here's a hint. Try looking in the desert or mountains of Afghanistan. Osama shouldn't be too hard to find. He'll be the really tall guy hooked up to an effing dialysis machine.
Jesus.
Here's the rest of the article from the Agence France-Presse (AFP)
US President George W. Bush and his top officials ran roughshod over the truth in the run-up to the Iraq war lying a total of 935 times, a study released Wednesday found.
Bush and his then secretary of state Colin Powell made the most false statements as they sought to drum up support for the March 2003 invasion to topple Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, the study alleged.
In a damning report, the Center for Public Integrity found "935 false statements by eight top administration officials that mentioned Iraq's possession of weapons of mass destruction, or links to Al-Qaeda, on at least 532 separate occasions."
"Bush and seven of his administration's top officials methodically propagated erroneous information over the two years beginning on September 11, 2001," the center said.
"These false statements dramatically increased in August 2002, just prior to congressional consideration of a war resolution and during the critical weeks in early 2003 when the president delivered his State of the Union address and Powell delivered his memorable presentation to the UN Security Council," the CPI added.
The study calls into question "the repeated assertions of Bush administration officials that they were merely the unwitting victims of bad intelligence," it added in a statement.
The US president was found to have made the most false statements referring a total of 260 times to Iraq's supposed weapons of mass destruction and Al-Qaeda alleged links to the Baghdad regime.
But then-secretary of state Powell only just lagged behind with 254 false communications, said the study by the center's founder Charles Lewis and researchers.
Charges that late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein had stockpiled an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction were the main argument used publicly in parliaments around the world and in the United Nations to justify the US-led invasion.
But after the invasion they turned out to be untrue, when no weapons of mass destruction were found by the invading forces.
Former national security advisor Condoleezza Rice, then defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and ex-deputy defense secretary Paul Wolfowitz were also fingered in the study, along with former White House press secretaries Ari Fleisher and Scott McClellan.
"This is a report like no other, which calls into question more than 900 false statements that were the underpinnings of the administration's case for war," argued the CPI's Executive Director Bill Buzenberg.
Cheney, for example, on August 26, 2002, in an address to the Veterans of Foreign Wars national convention, asserted: "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.
"There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us."
Former CIA chief George Tenet later noted Cheney's assertions exceeded his agency's assessments at the time, the report said.
In late September 2002, Bush with a congressional vote approaching on authorizing the use of military force in Iraq, insisted in a radio address that the Baghdad regime posed a global threat.
"The Iraqi regime possesses biological and chemical weapons, is rebuilding the facilities to make more and, according to the British government, could launch a biological or chemical attack in as little as 45 minutes after the order is given," Bush said.
"This regime is seeking a nuclear bomb, and with fissile material could build one within a year."
Other administration officials muddied the waters on the alleged relationship between Iraq and the Al-Qaeda terror network, the CPI said.
Asked in July 2002 if Iraq had relationships with Al-Qaeda terrorists, Rumsfeld said: "Sure."
Still, an assessment the same month by the Defense Intelligence Agency, confirmed by later by CIA chief Tenet, found an absence of any "compelling evidence demonstrating direct cooperation between the government of Iraq and Al-Qaeda."
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
You Don't Say...
Labels: politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
You know who we think they should send after him (Osama)... Dawg!!! Or I suppose any ole' bounty hunter would do... hell, they find anybody!!
Love the headline, btw :)
Post a Comment